Case Study: Hospital Transfer Jack Thompson is an 88 year old resident who came to live at the LTC facility two yearsago, after the death of his wife of 50 years. He is generally alert and oriented and can make hisimmediate needs known. He is fiercely independent and described by some of the staff as“difficult.” Despite being forgetful and occasionally confused, Jack refuses to accept much helpwith ADLs from the staff. However, he does have a “favorite” CNA, Helena, and he will generallyagree to medications, treatments or activities when she is on duty. Jack’s medical problems include congestive heart failure, with multiple hospitalizationsfor acute shortness of breath each year; atrial fibrillation, hypertension, chronic obstructivepulmonary disease, degenerative joint disease, falls, dizziness, insomnia and depression. Hismedications include: regularly-scheduled digoxin, furosemide, warfarin, metoprolol, albuterolMDI, and fluoxetine as well as trazodone as needed for sleep.One day, Helena comes in to work for 7-3, and Jack is still in bed (he is usually up at 6:00am). When she goes to awaken him, he asks to stay in bed, because he is feeling “very tired.” Itis very unusual for Jack to skip breakfast, the only meal he looks forward to. Helena wonders ifsomething may be going on, and pulls an Early Warning Tool out of her pocket, completes the The nurse agrees with Helena that Jack’s behavior is different from usual. The nursedecides to review his list of diagnoses, medications, and other orders. She notes that Jack hasbeen hospitalized several times for CHF and exacerbations of COPD, noting that both of theseconditions can present with respiratory difficulty. The nurse asks Helena to watch for any signsor symptoms of respiratory problems, such as shortness of breath, limited ability to ambulateusual distances or limited activity tolerance.It is now 1:00 pm. Helena comes to find the nurse, to report that Jack ate almost nothingat lunchtime, and drifted off, falling asleep during the meal. The nurse decides that an SBAR Form and progress note would be helpful to complete before calling the MD, NP, or PA. She takes the form out at the nurse’s station, and reviews the information needed in more detail.She asks Helena to help Jack into bed so that she can examine him. On exam, she finds that hehas a temperature of 99.1, HR of 92, RR of 28, BP 90/60 and pulse ox of 89%. She listens to hislungs and finds crackles bilaterally, with scattered wheezes. She examines his legs and finds 2+edema. She asks Helena, who reports that last week, he had virtually no edema. The nursereturns to the desk and reviews the information on the care path for congestive heart failureThe nurse completes the information requested on the SBAR form and contacts the nursepractitioner. After discussing the case, the nurse practitioner orders a CXR, CBC, BMP, and O2 at2 liters. She asks the nurse what advance directives are listed in the chart. The nurse says thatthere is an order for DNR, but nothing further. The nurse also comments, “the last few times wesent him out, he asked us not to go to the hospital again.”But no orders had been writtenThe nurse practitioner asked the nurse if she would be comfortable having a briefdiscussion with Mr. Thompson, about returning to the hospital if his condition were to worsen.The nurse practitioner referenced the INTERACT Advance Directives communication guide and suggested that some of the information might guide the nurse’s conversation. The nursepractitioner offered to follow up with Mr. Thompson in the morning, and document any newadvance directives, such as “do not hospitalize.” The nurse stated that she would becomfortable having that discussion, since she knows the resident very well (after two years) andwould keep the NP informed. The nurse reviewed the advance directives materials and went toUpon returning to the room, the nurse found Mr. Thompson to be in severe distress. Hisrespiratory rate was now 40, and he was gasping for breath. He seemed very anxious andfrightened. The nurse could not reassure him. She asked Helena to stay with the resident, andpaged the NP back and informed her of the change in condition. The nurse practitioner had beentrying to reach the resident’s daughter, his health care proxy; however she was not at home.Without a “Do not hospitalize” order in place, and being unable to stabilize the resident, thenurse and NP decided to transfer the resident to the ED. Because she had already completed theSBAR form, the nurse was able to quickly complete the Transfer Checklist and Resident Transfer Form, copy a few essential documents (MAR, SBAR with reason for transfer, code status, list of diagnoses) and send the resident to the ED with the essential paperwork.The nurse later called the ED, spoke with a physician, and asked if there was any otherdocumentation that the ED needed to care for this resident. She also gave the ED physician abrief report on the resident’s baseline and change in status. She explained to the ED physicianthat the nursing facility had the capability to provide IV antibiotics, PO or IM furosemide,nebulizers, oxygen, and that the NP was onsite at least twice weekly. Later that evening theresident (now stable) was transferred back to the nursing home, on increased p.o. lasix,nebulizers Q4hr, Qshift vital signs, daily weights and follow up with the NP within 24 hours.The next day, the facility INTERACT Champion completed the Transfer Review Tool and reviewed the case with all nursing staff on the unit. The NP spoke with the resident later thatweek, he elected “no further hospitalizations,” and the nursing home care plan was updated.
2009 H1N1 Influenza Vaccine Consent Form for Schools SECTION A: STUDENT INFORMATION Month_________ Day________ Year _______ SECTION B: PARENT/GUARDIAN INFORMATION Name (Last, First, Middle Initial): Address: SECTION C: SCREENING FOR VACCINE ELIGIBILITY Has your child already received the 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine? YES, Dose 1 -Date received: Month ____
An Adaptive Proportional Value-per-Click Agent for Bidding in Ad Auctions Kyriakos C. Chatzidimitriou Lampros C. Stavrogiannis Centre for Research and Technology Hellas Andreas L. Symeonidis and Pericles A. Mitkas Aristotle University of Thessaloniki and Centre for Research and Technology Hellas Abstract or CPC) rather than a per impression (cost-per-mille or CPM)basis. Sponsored